
The ICMA Centre has an international reputation for providing quality undergraduate, postgraduate and professional programmes tailored to the capital markets industry. The ICMA Centre’s success is based not only on the integration of applied finance theory and industry specific training but also its considerable professional and academic expertise, and strong links with companies and trade associations in the global finance industry.
If you would like more information about the ICMA Centre, please
contact
admin@icmacentre.ac.uk or call +44 0118 378 8239
Xiafei Li, Chris Brooks and Joëlle
Miffre
Abstract
The article analyses the impact of trading costs on the profitability of momentum strategies in the UK and concludes that losers are more expensive to trade than winners. The observed asymmetry in the costs of trading winners and losers crucially relates to the high cost of selling loser stocks with small size and low trading volume. Since transaction costs severely impact net momentum profits, the paper defines a new low-cost relative-strength strategy by shortlisting from all winner and loser stocks those with the lowest total transaction costs. While the study severely questions the profitability of standard momentum strategies, it concludes that there is still room for momentum-based return enhancement, should asset managers decide to adopt low-cost relative-strength strategies.
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/files/pdf/dps/dp2007_12.pdf
Carol Padgett and Zhiqi
Wang
Abstract
This paper examines the short-term signalling power of UK open market share repurchases between 1999 and 2004. The 5-day and 11-day abnormal returns centred on the announcement date are statistically significant at 1.13% and 1.21% respectively. However, there is no evidence to support any relationship between the 5-day announcement abnormal returns and characteristics of UK share repurchases, such as the percentage of shares to be repurchased, pre-announcement return, size and lag time. These results are largely in line with results reported by Rees (1996). It seems that UK share repurchases are not primarily motivated by share undervaluation. That is why the signalling hypothesis fails to explain the announcement abnormal returns of the UK open market share repurchases.
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/files/pdf/dps/dp_200710.pdf
Jacques Pézier
Abstract
Global portfolio optimization models rank among the proudest achievements of modern finance theory, but practitioners are still struggling to put them to work. In 1992, Black and Litterman recognized the difficulties portfolio managers have in expanding their personal views about some expected asset returns into full probabilistic forecasts about all asset returns and developed a method to facilitate this task. We propose a more general method based on a least discrimination (LD) principle. It produces a probabilistic forecast that is true to personal views but is otherwise as close as possible to a chosen reference forecast. For this purpose we expand the concept of optimal portfolio to include non-linear pay-offs and derive an economic measure of distance - a generalized relative entropy distance - between probabilistic forecasts. The LD method produces optimal portfolios matching any views, including views on volatility and correlation as well as expected returns, and containing option-like pay-offs, if allowed. It also justifies a simple linear interpolation between reference and personal forecasts, should a compromise need be reached.
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/files/pdf/dps/dp2007_07.pdf
Charles
Sutcliffe
Abstract
There is widespread dissatisfaction amongst employers with defined benefit pension schemes, and many are switching to defined contribution schemes. Career average is a form of defined benefit scheme that has some important advantages over final salary schemes. The comparison of career average and final salary schemes is a neglected area, and this paper offers one of the first in-depth analyses of this topic. It considers the advantages and disadvantages of a cost neutral switch to a career average re-valued earnings (CARE) scheme.
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/files/pdf/dps/dp2007_06.pdf
(Forthcoming in Journal of Banking and Finance)
Carol Alexander and Andreza Barbosa
Abstract
This paper presents an empirical study of hedging the four largest US index exchange traded funds (ETFs). When hedging each ETF position with its own index futures we find that it is difficult to improve on the naïve 1:1 futures hedge, that hedging is less effective around the time of dividend payments, and that hedged portfolio returns tend to have very large negative skewness and highly significant excess kurtosis. We also investigate the extent to which a long position on one ETF can be offset by a short position on another correlated ETF and consider how best to hedge portfolios of ETFs with one index futures. In these situations minimum variance hedging is clearly preferable to naïve hedging, although it seems to matter little which econometric hedge ratio is used, and the cross-hedged portfolio returns are closer to normality than the futures hedged portfolios. The evaluation focuses on a very large out of sample hedging performance analysis that includes aversion to negative skewness and excess kurtosis as well as effective reduction in variance. Our results should be of interest to hedge funds employing tax arbitrage or leveraged long-short equity strategies. They will also be of interest to ETF market makers since hedging is the most cost effective way of reducing the market risk of inventories, thus hedging enables market makers to reduce bid-ask spreads in a competitive environment.
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/files/pdf/dps/DP2007-01.pdf
Jacques Pezier and
Anthony White
Abstract
Can the new investable hedge fund indices (IHF) enhance the performance of optimal passive portfolios made of equities and bonds? How do they compare to funds of hedge funds (FoHF) as well as to other alternative investments such as commodities and volatility? The conclusions depend crucially on forecasts of future expected excess returns for all assets as well as a careful conditioning of the data to reflect trading costs and remove unrealistic serial correlations. A naïve forecast based on recent historical performance leads to no allocations to either IHF or FoHF, a result explained by the performance of equities and commodities and limited diversification effects from hedge funds. Yet a forecast based on market equilibrium returns for all main asset classes but hedge funds, which are kept at their historical level, leads to the opposite result with optimal portfolios almost exclusively invested in hedge funds. Both conclusions are unrealistic and unstable. More reasonable allocations are obtained with the Black-Litterman (BL) approach to combining subjective views with equilibrium returns. Then both hedge funds instruments play a significant role in optimal passive portfolios if their expected excess returns are at least 1%. Long volatility positions are also likely to be attractive. However the BL approach can also be criticised.
http://www.icmacentre.rdg.ac.uk/pdf/discussion/DP2006-10.pdf