Solving the investment communications paradox

Monday 6 January 2020

The communications paradox

Author: David Butcher

Asset managers need to become better at communications if they want to help investors, believes David Butcher

There’s a paradox in investment communications. And solving it could unlock a huge engagement opportunity. 

The investment management sector boasts some of the world’s brightest talent, with some of the biggest ideas.

But when investment businesses try and express those ideas to clients, they consistently struggle to do so with imagination, energy and purpose, particularly when it comes to their written communications. Great ideas lose their impact and meaning thanks to words and sentences that are too long for the audience to cope with. That’s the paradox, and empirical research suggests the communications challenge is significant.

As part of that research, we assembled a replica of what an investment client might read to keep up to date – 54 items of investment content, academic papers, Bank of England speeches and financial media articles – and we took readability measurements to work out what was more, and less, accessible.

The communications paradox - table 1


We found two things

Firstly, the investment content sample isn’t very readable. It achieves a mean readability score far closer to that of the academic papers (some of which have a reading age of 20.7 years) than to articles in the financial media (14.8 years). 

The research assumed that the reading audience ranges from engaged private investors to knowledgeable professional investors. But even then, the mean readability scores overshot what was assumed to be the appetite for this audience.


The communications paradox - table 3


While our study didn’t look at the reading appetite or capabilities of the 10 UK million people who have been automatically enrolled into their company pension scheme, it is safe to assume their investment knowledge is, on balance, minimal. 

But savers and investors of every hue respond to compelling stories told with conviction – and there’s no reason why investment content can’t draw meaningful links between, say, pensions and the climate crisis or inflation and a basket of groceries.

Our second finding was more of a shock: the labels attached to investment content have no bearing on their readability.

Intuitively, you might expect a paper with the warning “investment professionals only” to be more complex and challenging than one that’s “suitable for private clients”.

They’re not. At least not in our sample.

Six out of the 54 items were aimed at individuals/retail investors – and their readability scores were almost identical to those of the academic papers.

The 17 items aimed at “institutions” achieved readability scores right across the spectrum – some way above the academic scores, others comparable to UK tabloid newspapers!


The communications paradox - table 2


This is a big opportunity for investment businesses.

First of all, anyone responsible for communicating with clients – directly or through websites, the media or other channels – could start with a realistic assessment of their readers’ capabilities, preferences, and parameters. 

Second, investment managers could audit the readability of their existing materials. Such an audit, either undertaken internally or with outside support, could show managers where they meet or miss reader capabilities and appetite – allowing them to change course if need be.

Third, while it takes skill to simplify complex ideas and make them accessible, they could use shorter sentences and words, and think about more interesting turns of phrase, committing to telling clients stories they will remember and retell. Using technology to engage with clients in different, dynamic ways would certainly help. 

We are privileged to work in a sector that has to make sense of the world – in all its glorious complexity, from weather patterns to coffee prices, from populism to the births, marriages and deaths of companies.

The subject matter is thrilling.

Let’s give clients more reasons to engage with it.


David Butcher








David Butcher is managing director of Communications and Content – a marketing consultancy specialising in public relations and thought leadership in financial services.






Related Articles

Feb 2020 » Opinion

Should central banks join the fight against climate change

Feb 2020 » People

3-minute interview: Gary Baker, CFA

Jan 2020 » Opinion

What Malcolm Gladwell can teach investors about fund manager skill, and other investment matters

Jan 2020 » Opinion

Five new CFA UK Fellows views on the future of the industry

Jan 2020 » Investments

Money market funds’ liquidity risk management frameworks offer insights for other open-end funds

Jan 2020 » Investments

Risk to markets come from political distrust not central banks

Dec 2019 » ESG

What is the future for ESG investing?

Dec 2019 » Investments

Why we need investment into smart city infrastructure

Dec 2019 » People

3 minute CEO Tim Hodgson, ASIP

Dec 2019 » Opinion

The second order impacts of artificial intelligence

Nov 2019 » ESG

Researching approaches to responsible investment

Nov 2019 » ESG

How ESG will change the workforce

Nov 2019 » Opinion

How AI is helping the financial sector solve business problems

Nov 2019 » ESG

The value of ESG analysis

Oct 2019 » Opinion

Winner of CFA UK and Brandes Essay competition 2019

Oct 2019 » ESG

The investment industry should do more on climate change says Mark Carney

Oct 2019 » Opinion

The rise and rise of alternative data

Oct 2019 » Ethics

Ethics are evolving in asset management

Oct 2019 » ESG

Green bonds need not be niche but are often misunderstood

Sep 2019 » Fintech

How fintech is changing client experiences

Sep 2019 » Opinion

Upping the ante

Sep 2019 » ESG

Incorporating an ESG lens to future-proof your talent pool

Sep 2019 » Opinion

Blockchain based finance grows up

Aug 2019 » Behavioural Finance

Why we are not Odysseus

Aug 2019 » Opinion

Building a data-driven investment culture

Jul 2019 » ESG

What the 'prisoner's dilemma' tells us about climate change

Jun 2019 » Opinion

Don’t optimise, satisfice!

Jun 2019 » Opinion

The beta that Betty bought

Jun 2019 » Opinion

Seasons, natural disasters and perfect storms

May 2019 » People

3 minute CEO: Helen Thomas

May 2019 » Investments

What your personal decision-making style says about you

Mar 2019 » Investments

The dark side of investment management failure

Mar 2019 » Opinion

The implications of flexible working for investors

Feb 2019 » Opinion

Why we are still stuck in the use case phase of DLT?

Feb 2019 » Opinion

Do pension funds need to become more climate friendly?

Jan 2019 » Analysis

A time for relative re-assessment

Jan 2019 » Opinion

Why we need better company reporting

Dec 2018 » People

Profile Gillian Elcock

Nov 2018 » Analysis

Measuring the added value of stock recommendations

Oct 2018 » Analysis

Why the first investment company matters

Oct 2018 » Opinion

Profile Christian Burgin CFA

Oct 2018 » Opinion

Be warned: Bitcoin's energy costs can threaten your investment

Oct 2018 » Analysis

Monetary implications for financial markets

Jun 2017 » Opinion

Winner of CFA UK and Brandes Essay competition 2017

Jun 2016 » Opinion

Winner of CFA UK and Brandes Essay competition 2016